The Kalam Gravitational Argument

1. Everything that exists must obey the law of gravity
2. The universe exists
3. Therefor, the universe must obey the law of gravity

A hat tip and, if you're in Tulsa, a beer, to anyone who can explain why this is an unsound argument. If you understand that, you can understand why the Kalam Cosmological Argument for the existence of God is unsound.

Hint: ontological categories


Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is bullshit, part 1: The Bible is stupid

How evangelical culture and porn warped my idea of male sex drive

Randal Rauser on religious consensus