NDT on the science of "Gravity"

I haven't seen Gravity yet. I've heard it's pretty awesome; a friend described seeing it in IMax 3-D as "an hour and a half on the edge of my seat". It holds a ridiculously impressive 97% rating on Rotten Tomatoes and did big business over the weekend.

The film sort of presents itself as a slightly more plausible take on a sci-fi thriller, but the brilliant buzzkill Neil deGrasse Tyson is on hand to tell us how wrong the movie gets... well, just about everything:



I wonder how sci-fi nerds will take this. Some people, for example, really hated Ridley Scott's Alien prequel-ish film Prometheus because it gets a lot of science really wrong. (For the record, I concurred wholly with Roger Ebert's review.) But here's a supposedly more 'realistic' (at least by appearances – no warp drives, aliens, etc.) sci-fi film and it turns out it fails the science test pretty hard as well.

What ever are we to do? I dunno... maybe accept the fact that sci-fi films make concessions for storytelling and for the general ignorance of the movie-going populace and just enjoy the ride? Nah, there's some weird sense of pride that nerds get from being total buzzkills.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is bullshit, part 1: The Bible is stupid

The (pseudo) science of the film "Sunshine"

The Bible is a worthless historical document