Ballsy idea of the day: "the mind" does not exist

I have this crazy, far-out idea: we should stop talking about "the mind" as though it is some kind of object or thing that has to be "explained."

The problem is that conceptualizing mental phenomena as "the mind" presupposes that there are properties distinct from the physical brain - i.e., mental properties - that need to be explained in some way. Here's an alternative. Instead of characterizing mental processes as "the mind," we can use the empirically-responsible term: cognition. Cognition is the process of brain activity. It includes perception, language, metaphor, memory, and decision-making.

Why is this little semantic change a big deal? Because cognition is an empirical, scientific term. It accounts for all the above phenomena - all the things we associate with conscious experience. They are all derived from neurological activity in the brain.

With this conceptual reframing, we can do away with a few superfluous assumptions that are carried as baggage when we conceptualize mental phenomena as "the mind":

  • We don't need to operate on the assumption that mental phenomena require a unique set of non-physical paradigms to be understood
  • We don't need to assume that mental phenomena are distinct from neurological processes
  • We can view human cognition as part of an evolutionary continuum, rather than being distinct from animal cognition
  • We don't have to assume that mental processes are unembodied - an assumption that would require the rejection of cognitive science
That's my profound insight for the day. Commence fruitless internet debate!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is bullshit, part 1: The Bible is stupid

The (pseudo) science of the film "Sunshine"

Divorce